【 第1页 第2页 第3页 第4页 第5页 第6页 】

中评智库：拜登对华政策 另起炉灶

http://www.CRNTT.com   2022-07-31 00:05:22

注释： 　　〔1〕https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/04/biden-vows-to-restore-alliances-in-first-foreign-policy-address.html 　　〔2〕Mori Satoru (2021) The Biden Administration’s First Year in the Indo-Pacific: Balancing, Order-Building and Managing Competition with China, Asia-Pacific Review, 28:2, 77-106 　　〔3〕https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/02/10/biden-china-strategy-competition/ 　　〔4〕Nathan AJ. Biden’s China Policy: Old Wine in New Bottles? China Report. 2021;57(4):387-397.  　　〔5〕https://thehill.com/opinion/international/586589-its-time-for-an-alliance-of-democracies 　　〔6〕https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/11/10/biden-s-forthcoming-national-security-strategy-making-it-real-pub-85734 　　〔7〕https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/01/22/trump-broke-global-trading-system-biden-incapable-fixing/ 　　〔8〕https://edition.cnn.com/2022/01/26/politics/china-tariffs-biden-policy/index.html 　　〔9〕参阅李海默：《从英欧关系看拜登政府的对外策略失误》，《中国评论》，2022年2月号；李海默：《透视拜登政权下美欧关系的前景》，《中国评论》，2021年11月号。 　　〔10〕参阅：https://www.mei.edu/publications/build-back-better-world-alternative-chinas-bri-middle-east 　　〔11〕https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/594675-bidens-indo-pacific-strategy-an-unserious-strategy-for-deadly 　　〔12〕https://www.forbes.com/sites/stuartanderson/2022/02/10/america-first-trade-policies-harming-us-companies-in-china/ 　　〔13〕https://thehill.com/opinion/international/595041-its-official-the-biden-administration-has-outsourced-china-policy-to 　　〔14〕Malawer, Stuart, Biden's and Trump's Trade Policies. - Same as Trump's? More Aggressive? (January 29, 2022). 　　〔15〕许多分析人士都认为，拜登的整套互联网政策都是明显针对中国的。参阅：https://www.brookings.edu/techstream/the-us-must-broaden-its-internet-strategy-beyond-china/ 　　〔16〕https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/592579-biden-planning-several-stops-during-asia-trip-this-spring-report 　　〔17〕参阅：https://joebiden.com/supplychains/ 　　〔18〕关于此点，可参阅：https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/biden-trump-neopopulist-economic-doctrine-by-nouriel-roubini-2021-08 　　〔19〕https://online.ucpress.edu/as/article/62/1/1/120100/The-United-States-and-Asia-in-2021Change ；亦可参阅：https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2022/04/15/future-scenarios-about-a-potential-u-s-china-nuclear-war-in-taiwan-and-south-china-sea/ 　　〔20〕https://progressive.org/latest/why-we-still-have-trump-foreign-policy-benjamin-davies-220120/ 　　〔21〕https://thehill.com/opinion/international/593558-joe-bidens-three-magnet-problem/ 　　〔22〕https://www.thedefensepost.com/2022/02/08/biden-european-reset/ 　　〔23〕参阅：https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/10/13/biden-strategic-competition-national-defense-strategy/ 　　〔24〕 Holger Janusch (2022) Communicative Power America: A Vision for a New US Grand Strategy, The International Spectator 　　〔25〕https://carnegieendowment.org/2022/02/21/why-u.s.-china-relations-are-locked-in-stalemate-pub-86478 　　〔26〕https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/foreign-policy/594833-bucking-the-anti-china-trend 　　〔27〕时殷弘.拜登政府对华态势考察：非战略军事阵线[J].国际安全研究,2021,(6):3-27 　　〔28〕https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/594542-39-percent-of-americans-approve-of-bidens-handling-of-the-pandemic

【 第1页 第2页 第3页 第4页 第5页 第6页 】